data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfe26/dfe26b059687850ddbab3b0676282b23fb4fe950" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4e93/f4e9342d37f2039546ef4b11cfae780dddc9e916" alt=""
When relating the ideas in Text I with those in Text II, one concludes that the
- A. author of Comment 1, U.N., has a view that is contrary to that manifested by the author of Text I in terms of a countrys economic standards.
- B. author of Comment 2, T. McK, supports the argument on the relation between economic growth and foreign workforce exposed in Text I.
- C. author of Comment 1, U.N., and the author of Comment 3, J.I., side with the author of Text I about immigration and economic development.
- D. authors of Comments 2 and 3, T. McK and J.I., respectively, oppose the view on the relation between economic development and rates of immigration expressed in Text I.
- E. three commentators agree with the perspective on the importance of immigration defended by the author of Text I.