The only argument that CANNOT be considered supportive of publishing the IMF documents is that the
public must be made aware of what the IMF has been doing and the support it is giving to economic policy issues.
IMF will be regarded as a more trustworthy institution if it releases its documents and financial decisions to the public at large.
language used in documents that circulate publicly is usually more controlled and therefore less frank and direct in exposing opinions and facts.
lack of access of external stakeholders to the issues the IMF supports and the actions it takes makes the institution more vulnerable and less effective.
relevant changes made to the financing structure of the institution were only effected in recognition of the IMF as a reputable and candid organization.
{TITLE}
{CONTENT}
{TITLE}
Aguarde, enviando solicitação...