Questões de Inglês do ano 2020
Lista completa de Questões de Inglês do ano 2020 para resolução totalmente grátis. Selecione os assuntos no filtro de questões e comece a resolver exercícios.
Analise as afirmativas a seguir:
I. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: how was it that he did not come? (por que ele não veio?).
II. O trecho em inglês as it were possui a grafia correta e pode ser adequadamente traduzido para: por assim dizer.
Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
I. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: how was it that he did not come? (por que ele não veio?).
II. O trecho em inglês as it were possui a grafia correta e pode ser adequadamente traduzido para: por assim dizer.
Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
-
A) As duas afirmativas são verdadeiras
B) A afirmativa I é verdadeira, e a II é falsa.
C) A afirmativa II é verdadeira, e a I é falsa.
D) As duas afirmativas são falsas.
Analise as afirmativas a seguir:
I. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: thats him excused over (isto é típico dele).
II. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: how are we to go on? (como vamos continuar? ou que será de nós?).
Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
I. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: thats him excused over (isto é típico dele).
II. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: how are we to go on? (como vamos continuar? ou que será de nós?).
Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
-
A) As duas afirmativas são verdadeiras.
B) A afirmativa I é verdadeira, e a II é falsa.
C) A afirmativa II é verdadeira, e a I é falsa.
D) As duas afirmativas são falsas.
Protest
Womens March plans return to D.C. in October to protest Supreme Court nomination.
Protesters fill the streets of Washington during the Women's March after President Trump's inauguration in 2017.
(Oliver Contreras for The Washington Post)
The day after President Trumps inauguration in 2017, the Womens March drew millions of people to the streets of Washington, D.C., and cities across the country in a collective display of outrage and grief that was widely considered the largest single-day protest in American history.
As another presidential election nears and as the nation faces a deadly pandemic, historic racial justice protests and a contentious Supreme Court nomination process, the Womens March organizers are hoping to, once again, channel grief and fear into action. But this time, theyre not waiting until January.
Last week, the Womens March organization said it is planning a socially distant march in Washington and more than 30 other cities on Oct. 17, days before Senate Republicans aim to vote on Trumps pick to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. Trump has nominated Amy Coney Barrett, a circuit judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, whose writings have led conservatives and liberals to believe she would be willing to vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. She has also been critical of a 2012 Supreme Court decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act.
By Samantha Schmidt, The Washington Post, September, 28, 2020 (https://wapo.st/35v9HhB).
Leia o texto 'Protest' e, em seguida, analise as afirmativas a seguir: I. No texto, o trecho She has also been critical of a 2012 Supreme Court decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act traz a palavra upheld, que significa suspendeu. II. De acordo com as informações do texto, pode-se concluir que Amy Coney Barrett é uma juíza na corte americana de apelações. Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
-
A) As duas afirmativas são verdadeiras.
B) A afirmativa I é verdadeira, e a II é falsa.
C) A afirmativa II é verdadeira, e a I é falsa.
D) As duas afirmativas são falsas.
Protest
Womens March plans return to D.C. in October to protest Supreme Court nomination.
Protesters fill the streets of Washington during the Women's March after President Trump's inauguration in 2017.
(Oliver Contreras for The Washington Post)
The day after President Trumps inauguration in 2017, the Womens March drew millions of people to the streets of Washington, D.C., and cities across the country in a collective display of outrage and grief that was widely considered the largest single-day protest in American history.
As another presidential election nears and as the nation faces a deadly pandemic, historic racial justice protests and a contentious Supreme Court nomination process, the Womens March organizers are hoping to, once again, channel grief and fear into action. But this time, theyre not waiting until January.
Last week, the Womens March organization said it is planning a socially distant march in Washington and more than 30 other cities on Oct. 17, days before Senate Republicans aim to vote on Trumps pick to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. Trump has nominated Amy Coney Barrett, a circuit judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, whose writings have led conservatives and liberals to believe she would be willing to vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. She has also been critical of a 2012 Supreme Court decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act.
By Samantha Schmidt, The Washington Post, September, 28, 2020 (https://wapo.st/35v9HhB).
Leia o texto 'Protest' e, em seguida, analise as afirmativas a seguir: I. As informações presentes no texto permitem concluir que os organizadores da Womans March esperam, novamente, canalizar o seu luto e medo em ação. II. As informações presentes no texto permitem inferir que no dia após o ato de posse do atual Presidente Donald Trump, a Womans March levou milhões de pessoas às ruas de Washington D.C.. Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
-
A) As duas afirmativas são verdadeiras.
B) A afirmativa I é verdadeira, e a II é falsa.
C) A afirmativa II é verdadeira, e a I é falsa.
D) As duas afirmativas são falsas.
Protest
Womens March plans return to D.C. in October to protest Supreme Court nomination.
Protesters fill the streets of Washington during the Women's March after President Trump's inauguration in 2017.
(Oliver Contreras for The Washington Post)
The day after President Trumps inauguration in 2017, the Womens March drew millions of people to the streets of Washington, D.C., and cities across the country in a collective display of outrage and grief that was widely considered the largest single-day protest in American history.
As another presidential election nears and as the nation faces a deadly pandemic, historic racial justice protests and a contentious Supreme Court nomination process, the Womens March organizers are hoping to, once again, channel grief and fear into action. But this time, theyre not waiting until January.
Last week, the Womens March organization said it is planning a socially distant march in Washington and more than 30 other cities on Oct. 17, days before Senate Republicans aim to vote on Trumps pick to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. Trump has nominated Amy Coney Barrett, a circuit judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, whose writings have led conservatives and liberals to believe she would be willing to vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. She has also been critical of a 2012 Supreme Court decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act.
By Samantha Schmidt, The Washington Post, September, 28, 2020 (https://wapo.st/35v9HhB).
Leia o texto 'Protest' e, em seguida, analise as afirmativas a seguir: I. No texto, o trecho Womens March drew millions of people to the streets of Washington, D.C. traz a palavra drew, que significa afastou. II. No texto, o trecho a contentious Supreme Court nomination process traz a palavra contentious, que significa coordenado. Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
-
A) As duas afirmativas são verdadeiras.
B) A afirmativa I é verdadeira, e a II é falsa.
C) A afirmativa II é verdadeira, e a I é falsa.
D) As duas afirmativas são falsas.
On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016
People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election.
During the 2016 presidential election, Russian operatives used Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and other social media platforms to spread disinformation to divide the American electorate. Since then, the social media companies have spent billions of dollars and hired tens of thousands of people to help clean up their act.
People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election, according to new research from the German Marshall Fund Digital, the digital arm of the public policy think tank. The organization, which has a data partnership with the start-up NewsGuard and the social media analytics firm NewsWhip, published its findings on Monday.
In total, Facebook likes, comments and shares of articles from news outlets that regularly publish falsehoods and misleading content roughly tripled from the third quarter of 2016 to the third quarter of 2020, the group found.
By Davey Alba, The New York Times (https://nyti.ms/31zUivt).
Leia o texto 'On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016' e, em seguida, analise as afirmativas a seguir: I. Após a análise do texto, é possível concluir que as pessoas estão mais engajadas no Facebook, com relação aos meios de comunicação que, rotineiramente, publicam desinformação, quando comparado com o ano das eleições de 2016, de acordo com a pesquisa do German Marshall Fund Digital. II. No texto, o trecho Russian operatives used Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and other social media platforms to spread disinformation... traz a palavra spread, que significa superar. Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
-
A) As duas afirmativas são verdadeiras.
B) A afirmativa I é verdadeira, e a II é falsa.
C) A afirmativa II é verdadeira, e a I é falsa.
D) As duas afirmativas são falsas.
On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016
People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election.
During the 2016 presidential election, Russian operatives used Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and other social media platforms to spread disinformation to divide the American electorate. Since then, the social media companies have spent billions of dollars and hired tens of thousands of people to help clean up their act.
People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election, according to new research from the German Marshall Fund Digital, the digital arm of the public policy think tank. The organization, which has a data partnership with the start-up NewsGuard and the social media analytics firm NewsWhip, published its findings on Monday.
In total, Facebook likes, comments and shares of articles from news outlets that regularly publish falsehoods and misleading content roughly tripled from the third quarter of 2016 to the third quarter of 2020, the group found.
By Davey Alba, The New York Times (https://nyti.ms/31zUivt).
Leia o texto 'On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016' e, em seguida, analise as afirmativas a seguir: I. Após a análise do texto, é possível inferir que as empresas responsáveis pelas redes sociais investiram milhões de dólares para melhorar a acessibilidade dos aplicativos. II. No texto, o trecho regularly publish falsehoods and misleading content traz a palavra misleading, que significa impreciso. Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
-
A) As duas afirmativas são verdadeiras.
B) A afirmativa I é verdadeira, e a II é falsa.
C) A afirmativa II é verdadeira, e a I é falsa.
D) As duas afirmativas são falsas.
On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016
People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election.
During the 2016 presidential election, Russian operatives used Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and other social media platforms to spread disinformation to divide the American electorate. Since then, the social media companies have spent billions of dollars and hired tens of thousands of people to help clean up their act.
People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election, according to new research from the German Marshall Fund Digital, the digital arm of the public policy think tank. The organization, which has a data partnership with the start-up NewsGuard and the social media analytics firm NewsWhip, published its findings on Monday.
In total, Facebook likes, comments and shares of articles from news outlets that regularly publish falsehoods and misleading content roughly tripled from the third quarter of 2016 to the third quarter of 2020, the group found.
By Davey Alba, The New York Times (https://nyti.ms/31zUivt).
Leia o texto 'On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016' e, em seguida, analise as afirmativas a seguir: I. No texto, o trecho social media analytics firm NewsWhip, published its findings on Monday. traz a palavra findings, que significa formular. II. As informações presentes no texto permitem inferir que as pessoas, atualmente, estão mais engajadas no Facebook, com relação aos meios de comunicação que, rotineiramente, publicam desinformação, do que antes das eleições de 2016, como pode ser observado no trecho a seguir: People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election.. Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
-
A) As duas afirmativas são verdadeiras.
B) A afirmativa I é verdadeira, e a II é falsa.
C) A afirmativa II é verdadeira, e a I é falsa.
D) As duas afirmativas são falsas.
On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016
People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election.
During the 2016 presidential election, Russian operatives used Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and other social media platforms to spread disinformation to divide the American electorate. Since then, the social media companies have spent billions of dollars and hired tens of thousands of people to help clean up their act.
People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election, according to new research from the German Marshall Fund Digital, the digital arm of the public policy think tank. The organization, which has a data partnership with the start-up NewsGuard and the social media analytics firm NewsWhip, published its findings on Monday.
In total, Facebook likes, comments and shares of articles from news outlets that regularly publish falsehoods and misleading content roughly tripled from the third quarter of 2016 to the third quarter of 2020, the group found.
By Davey Alba, The New York Times (https://nyti.ms/31zUivt).
Leia o texto 'On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016' e, em seguida, analise as afirmativas a seguir: I. No texto, o trecho the social media companies have spent billions of dollars traz a palavra spent, que significa espalhar. II. De acordo com as informações do texto, pode-se concluir que o German Marshall Fund Digital tem uma parceria com a start-up NewsGuard e com a social media analytics firm NewsWhip. Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
-
A) As duas afirmativas são verdadeiras.
B) A afirmativa I é verdadeira, e a II é falsa.
C) A afirmativa II é verdadeira, e a I é falsa.
D) As duas afirmativas são falsas.
Look at the picture. Based on what you can see, choose the CORRECT answer.
He _________ his hand if he touches that hot pan.
He _________ his hand if he touches that hot pan.
-
A) Burns.
B) Is going to burn.
C) Has burnt.
D) Will burn.
O Provas e Concursos é um banco de dados de questões de concursos públicos organizadas por matéria, assunto, ano, banca organizadora, etc
Contato
contato@provaseconcursos.com.br
